At a glance
- Source
- Yotzov, Barrero, Bloom, Bunn, Davis, Foster, Jalca, Meyer, Mizen, Navarrete, Smietanka, Thwaites and Wang (2026). Firm Data on AI. NBER Working Paper 34836 (February 2026, revised March 2026). doi:10.3386/w34836 · Not peer-reviewed: other researchers have not yet checked it for a journal.
- How it was done
- The authors put the same questions to senior executives in four standing business surveys run with central banks and a university, between November 2025 and January 2026. Survey. People answered questions once. It shows what goes together, not what causes what.
- Who took part
- Nearly 6,000 senior executives, such as chief executives and finance directors, in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Australia.
- Where
- Four countries. The surveys were run with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Bank of England, the Deutsche Bundesbank and Macquarie University.
“Third, executives report little own-firm impact of AI over the last 3 years, with nine-in-ten reporting no impact on employment or productivity.”
What it found
- Use. 69% of firms actively used AI: 78% in the United States, 71% in the United Kingdom, 65% in Germany and 59% in Australia. Younger, more productive and larger firms used it more often.
- What for. The most common use was text generation with AI chatbots, by 41% of firms.
- Executives’ own use. More than two-thirds of executives used AI regularly, for about 1.5 hours a week on average.
- Effect so far. Nine in ten executives said AI had not changed their firm’s employment or productivity over the past three years.
- Expected effect. Over the next three years, executives expect AI to raise productivity by 1.4%, raise output by 0.8% and cut employment by 0.7%. Employees, asked separately, expect employment at their firms to rise 0.5%.
When the result holds
The figure for use depends on who is asked and how. The US Census Bureau’s survey of all US firms found 18% using AI in a business function at about the same time. The Census authors explain most of the gap by the size and sector of the firms in each sample: about 75% of US firms have fewer than 10 employees.
Limits
- A working paper, not peer-reviewed.
- Every figure is reported by the executives themselves. “No effect” may also mean that a firm has not measured one.
- The surveys ask at one point in time. They show what goes together, not what causes what.
Practices that use this study
This study supports: