<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <title>What’s new on AI-first company</title>
  <subtitle>What works and what fails in running an AI-first business</subtitle>
  <id>https://www.ai-first.company/feed.xml</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.ai-first.company/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
  <entry>
    <title>Ask AI vendors for proof before you buy, and test on your own material</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/ask-ai-vendors-for-proof/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/ask-ai-vendors-for-proof/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Do not take an AI vendor’s accuracy figure or “fully compliant” promise on trust. Ask how it was tested and on what, run a small test on your own material, and check the terms on your data and on leaving.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Assess readiness from several sources, not one executive’s rating</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/assess-readiness-from-several-sources/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/assess-readiness-from-several-sources/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>A readiness check filled in by one senior person reflects that person’s view. Ask staff and managers as well, and compare the answers with what you can observe.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Budget for the work AI creates</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/budget-for-the-work-ai-creates/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/budget-for-the-work-ai-creates/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>AI removes some work and adds other work: checking its output, keeping records, handling exceptions and looking after the tools. Count that work and give it an owner before you count the saving.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Check AI advice on money, tax and law before you act on it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-ai-advice-before-you-act-on-it/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-ai-advice-before-you-act-on-it/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>When you use an AI tool as an adviser, check its advice on money, tax and law against a reliable source or a professional before you act. In a small firm, nobody else will catch a wrong answer.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Check now and then what staff can do without the AI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-what-staff-can-still-do-without-the-tool/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-what-staff-can-still-do-without-the-tool/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>On a sample of cases, have people do the work without the AI and compare the result with their usual work. Start with the people who check AI output and the people still learning the job, and set the tools that learners use to give hints, not answers.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Claim only what your AI has been tested to do</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/claim-only-what-your-ai-has-been-tested-to-do/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/claim-only-what-your-ai-has-been-tested-to-do/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>If you tell customers that your product or service uses AI, or how well it works, hold the evidence before you say it. Regulators treat “AI-powered” and “98% accurate” as factual claims like any other.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Decide what data may go into which AI tools</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/decide-what-data-goes-into-which-ai-tools/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/decide-what-data-goes-into-which-ai-tools/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Sort your data into two or three groups and say which AI tools each group may go into. Client secrets and personal data stay out of public tools. Where a mistake would be serious, block the upload instead of relying on a rule.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Do not treat a maturity score as a forecast</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/do-not-treat-a-maturity-score-as-a-forecast/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/do-not-treat-a-maturity-score-as-a-forecast/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>An AI maturity or readiness score describes where you say you stand. Evidence that a higher score leads to better results is thin and disputed. Use it to start a discussion, not to predict returns.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>For each kind of task, test whether a person with AI beats either one alone</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-human-plus-ai-by-task-type/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/check-human-plus-ai-by-task-type/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Do not assume that adding a person to AI, or AI to a person, gives the best result. Test it for each type of task before you settle the process.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Give AI assistance to newer staff first</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/give-ai-assistance-to-newer-staff-first/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/give-ai-assistance-to-newer-staff-first/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>When you roll out an AI assistant for a well-defined task, start with your less experienced people. Studies find they gain the most.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Keep a person checking anything that goes to a customer or carries legal weight</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/keep-a-person-checking-what-goes-out/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/keep-a-person-checking-what-goes-out/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Before AI output leaves the company or is relied on in a decision, a named person checks it against real sources and signs it off. Make the check a step in the process, with time allowed for it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Keep the entry-level tasks that newcomers learn on</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/keep-entry-level-learning-tasks/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/keep-entry-level-learning-tasks/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Before you automate routine work, check whether it is how juniors learn the job. If it is, keep some of it for them, or replace the learning another way.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Know the rules that already apply to your AI use</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/know-the-rules-that-apply-to-your-ai-use/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/know-the-rules-that-apply-to-your-ai-use/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Most of the rules that bind your use of AI are not AI laws. You answer for what your AI says and does under the consumer, privacy, advertising and professional rules you already follow. List your AI uses and match each to its rules.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Make the AI show what its answer is based on</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/make-the-ai-show-what-its-answer-is-based-on/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/make-the-ai-show-what-its-answer-is-based-on/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>A score or an estimate with no reason attached is hard to judge. Choose and set up AI tools so that each answer comes with what it rests on: the marked part of the image, the similar past cases, the passage in the document.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Map tasks before deciding what to automate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/map-tasks-before-automating/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/map-tasks-before-automating/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Break jobs into tasks and look at each one. Published scores rate how much of a job AI could do, its “exposure”. Treat a high score as a place to look, not as a decision to automate.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Measure time saved per task against a baseline</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/measure-time-saved-against-a-baseline/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/measure-time-saved-against-a-baseline/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Record how long a task takes and how good the result is before you add AI. Without that starting figure you cannot tell a real gain from a hopeful one.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Name one accountable AI owner</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/name-one-accountable-ai-owner/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/name-one-accountable-ai-owner/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Give one named senior person the responsibility for AI: priorities, budget, risk and results. Shared responsibility tends to mean nobody decides.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protect psychological safety during an AI rollout</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/protect-psychological-safety-during-rollout/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/protect-psychological-safety-during-rollout/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>AI projects can make staff afraid to speak up and unwilling to share what they know. Say early what AI means for jobs, and consult the people affected.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Put your own records in order before you ask AI to predict from them</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/put-your-records-in-order-before-ai-predicts-from-them/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/put-your-records-in-order-before-ai-predicts-from-them/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>An AI that estimates a price, a time or a next step learns from your past jobs and customers. Get those records complete, consistent and in one place first. In the cases here, that was most of the work.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Redesign the workflow instead of adding a tool to it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/redesign-the-workflow/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/redesign-the-workflow/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Giving people an AI tool inside an unchanged process changes little. Decide again who does each step, in what order, and where a person checks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Run two tracks: hand some tasks to AI, give experts AI help on others</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/run-two-tracks-automate-and-augment/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/run-two-tracks-automate-and-augment/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Treat AI work as two programmes. One automates repeatable digital tasks whose results are easy to check. The other gives experts AI help on work that cannot be handed over. Judge each by its own measure.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Set the limits before the tool acts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/set-the-limits-before-the-tool-acts/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/set-the-limits-before-the-tool-acts/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Before an AI tool sets a price, sends a message or takes a step for you, write down what it must never do, how far it may go, and what needs a person. Build those limits into the tool, then test inside them.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Start with one costly process, not a company-wide rollout</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/start-with-one-costly-process/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/start-with-one-costly-process/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Pick one process that visibly costs time or money. Apply AI there, with a person checking the output, and expand only when the numbers move.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Start with ready-made AI in software you already use, before building your own</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/start-with-ai-in-software-you-already-pay-for/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/start-with-ai-in-software-you-already-pay-for/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Your office, accounting, support and sales software probably has AI features now. Try those on one task, with a few licences and a measured result, before you pay anyone to build something custom.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Train staff on the tools you actually chose</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/train-staff-on-the-tools-you-chose/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/train-staff-on-the-tools-you-chose/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Show every user what your chosen AI tool is, where it goes wrong, and what they must check. Use your own tasks and your own rules, give people time to practise, and include temporary staff.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>When AI output goes wrong, correct it fast and in the open</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/correct-ai-mistakes-fast-and-in-the-open/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/correct-ai-mistakes-fast-and-in-the-open/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Decide now what happens when an AI error gets out: who is told, who withdraws or corrects the work, and who checks how far the problem goes. In the documented cases, firms that owned up quickly were treated far better than firms that defended the error.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Write a one-page AI-use policy staff will actually read</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/write-a-short-ai-use-policy/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/write-a-short-ai-use-policy/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Put the rules for AI on one page: which tools are allowed, what must never be typed in, who checks the output, and who to ask. Then build the most important rule into the work itself, because a page alone gets ignored.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Air AI: the US regulator says small firms were sold “AI that replaces staff” and lost up to $250,000</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/air-ai-ftc-ai-business-opportunity/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/air-ai-ftc-ai-business-opportunity/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Air AI sold small-business owners “conversational AI” that it said could replace customer-service staff, with promises that they would earn their money back. The US consumer regulator alleges that buyers lost up to $250,000 each and that promised refunds were rarely paid. Under a proposed settlement the owners are banned from marketing business opportunities.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commonwealth Bank of Australia cut 45 roles for a voice bot, then said they were not redundant</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/commonwealth-bank-voice-bot-job-cuts/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/commonwealth-bank-voice-bot-job-cuts/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Commonwealth Bank of Australia announced that an AI voice bot would replace 45 customer-service roles. The staff union said calls were rising, not falling. A month later the bank said its assessment had been an error, that the roles were not redundant, and apologised.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deloitte Australia: a government report reissued to fix wrong citations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/deloitte-australia-report-corrections/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/deloitte-australia-report-corrections/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A Deloitte report for an Australian government department had to be reissued to correct citations and a summary of a court case. The corrected version disclosed the use of a generative AI tool. The report does not say AI caused the errors.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Garfield.Law: a regulator authorised an AI-run law firm for small debt claims, with limits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/garfield-law-ai-law-firm/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/garfield-law-ai-law-firm/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>The regulator of solicitors in England and Wales authorised its first law firm that delivers legal services through AI. It helps businesses recover unpaid debts through the small-claims court. The regulator set limits: the AI may not propose case law, takes no step the client has not approved, and named solicitors stay accountable.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HMRC gave 3,000 Copilot licences at random: about an hour a week saved, by staff estimate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/hmrc-copilot-randomised-licences/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/hmrc-copilot-randomised-licences/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>The UK tax authority picked 3,000 staff at random and gave them an AI assistant inside their office software for three months. Most used it and liked it. Staff estimated it saved about an hour a week, and the authority cut self-reported estimates to allow for keen users answering more often.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Klarna: an AI assistant took two-thirds of support chats, then the company hired people again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/klarna-ai-customer-service/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/klarna-ai-customer-service/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Klarna reported large savings from an AI support assistant. About a year later its chief executive said the company had judged the work too much on cost, and it began hiring human agents again. The AI assistant stayed.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Presto Automation: the US regulator found most “AI” drive-through orders needed a person</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/presto-automation-sec-ai-ordering/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/presto-automation-sec-ai-ordering/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Presto sold restaurants a voice AI for drive-through orders and told investors it eliminated human order-taking. The US securities regulator found that people working off site, mainly in the Philippines and India, entered the vast majority of orders. Presto settled without admitting or denying the findings.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Primus Solicitors: 18 court citations that did not exist, taken from a client’s AI research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/primus-solicitors-fake-citations/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/primus-solicitors-fake-citations/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A solicitor at a small law firm filed a statement with 45 case citations. Eighteen of the cases did not exist. His client had produced the research with public AI tools, and nobody at the firm checked it. The court referred him to his regulator.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PSG Global Solutions: AI ran the job interviews, and people made the hiring decisions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/psg-global-solutions-ai-interviews/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/psg-global-solutions-ai-interviews/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A recruitment firm let an AI voice agent carry out job interviews, while its human recruiters kept every hiring decision. In a randomised study of 70,884 applications, people interviewed by the AI were 12% more likely to get an offer and more likely to stay in the job.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Department for Business and Trade: 1,000 Copilot licences, satisfied users, no proven productivity gain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/uk-department-for-business-and-trade-copilot-pilot/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/uk-department-for-business-and-trade-copilot-pilot/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A UK government department gave 1,000 staff an AI assistant inside the office software they already used, and measured the result. Most users were satisfied and writing tasks went faster. Some tasks went slower or came out worse, and the department found no evidence of higher productivity.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>46% of US small employer firms use AI; 31% of users report higher sales</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/us-small-employer-firms-ai-survey/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/us-small-employer-firms-ai-survey/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A Federal Reserve survey of US small employer firms: 46% use AI. Among users, 71% report higher productivity but 31% higher sales, and 18% spend less on outside services.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>6,000 executives in four countries: 69% of firms use AI, nine in ten see no effect yet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/firm-data-on-ai-four-countries/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/firm-data-on-ai-four-countries/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of nearly 6,000 executives in the US, UK, Germany and Australia: 69% of firms use AI, and nine in ten report no effect on jobs or productivity so far.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Across 160,097 developers, experienced programmers gained from AI coding tools and early-career ones did not</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/who-captures-ai-coding-gains/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/who-captures-ai-coding-gains/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of 30 million GitHub commits: AI wrote about 29% of US Python functions. Experienced developers gained from it; early-career developers showed no clear benefit.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>After three months with AI, endoscopists found fewer growths without it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/endoscopist-skill-after-ai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/endoscopist-skill-after-ai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of 1,443 colonoscopies done without AI in Poland: after AI arrived, the detection rate of pre-cancerous growths fell from 28.4% to 22.4% within three months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI decided which scans got one reader or two: more cancers found, 44% less reading</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-triage-in-breast-screening/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-triage-in-breast-screening/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A trial with 105,934 women in Sweden: AI sent low-risk scans to one radiologist and high-risk scans to two. Screening found more cancers with 44% fewer readings.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI exposure and career moves in Brazil and the UK</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-exposure-and-occupational-mobility/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-exposure-and-occupational-mobility/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of job moves in Brazil and the UK: AI could open career paths for young graduates and also remove the stepping-stone jobs they start in.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI exposure and employment in 23 countries</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-exposure-and-employment-oecd/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-exposure-and-employment-oecd/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Across 23 OECD countries, jobs more exposed to AI did not lose employment overall. Where computer use was high, more exposure went with faster job growth.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI scribes in a randomised trial: one tool cut note time by 9.5%, and doctors used them in about a third of visits</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-scribe-randomised-trial/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-scribe-randomised-trial/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A trial with 238 doctors: one AI scribe cut time spent writing notes by 9.5%, another made no clear difference, and doctors used the scribes in about a third of visits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An AI business adviser helped strong small firms and hurt weak ones</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-business-mentor-kenya/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-business-mentor-kenya/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 640 small-business owners in Kenya: a GPT-4 adviser made no difference on average, but weaker firms did nearly 10% worse and stronger ones better.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bank records: 17.7% of small US firms had paid for AI by end-2025</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/small-business-ai-payments-bank-data/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/small-business-ai-payments-bank-data/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Payment records of over 4.6 million small US firms: 17.7% had paid for an AI service by December 2025, with a median spend of about $28 a month.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Colleagues judge people who use AI as less competent</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/social-penalty-for-using-ai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/social-penalty-for-using-ai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Four experiments with 4,439 people: workers who use AI expect to be judged as less competent and less motivated, and they are judged that way.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Experienced developers were slower with AI and believed they were faster</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/developers-slower-with-ai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/developers-slower-with-ai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 16 experienced developers: tasks took 19% longer when AI was allowed, yet the developers believed AI had made them about 20% faster.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fewer young people hired into AI-exposed jobs: US payroll data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/young-workers-in-ai-exposed-jobs/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/young-workers-in-ai-exposed-jobs/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>US payroll records: employment of 22–25-year-olds in AI-exposed jobs is 19% below that of less exposed peers, mostly from fewer hires. Older workers show no gap.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Firms that put generative AI into their work hired fewer juniors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-adopters-and-junior-hiring/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-adopters-and-junior-hiring/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Résumé data on 65 million US workers: at firms that hired staff to build generative AI into their work, junior employment fell about 9% within six quarters.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Freelance demand for writing and translation fell 20–50% after ChatGPT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/freelance-demand-after-chatgpt/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/freelance-demand-after-chatgpt/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Postings on a global freelance platform: after ChatGPT, demand for writing and translation fell 20–50% below trend, while demand for chatbot work nearly tripled.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Freelance job posts for writing and coding fell 21% after ChatGPT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/freelance-postings-after-chatgpt/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/freelance-postings-after-chatgpt/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of a global freelance platform: posts for writing and coding jobs fell 21% within eight months of ChatGPT, and posts for image creation fell 17% after image AI.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>German small and medium-sized firms: skills and innovation predict AI use better than size</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-in-the-mittelstand-kfw/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-in-the-mittelstand-kfw/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of about 6,800 German small and medium-sized firms: 20% used AI in 2022–2024. Once skills and innovation are counted, firm size matters little.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How automation eroded skills at an accounting firm</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/vicious-circles-of-skill-erosion/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/vicious-circles-of-skill-erosion/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A case study of an accounting firm: years of relying on automated software wore down staff skills, and neither staff nor managers noticed.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>McKinsey’s 2025 global survey on AI in organizations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/state-of-ai-2025-survey/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/state-of-ai-2025-survey/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 1,993 people in 105 countries: about 6% of organizations report large profit gains from AI. They are far more likely to have redesigned workflows.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Office AI assistant saved email time but did not change the work</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/copilot-field-experiment-66-firms/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/copilot-field-experiment-66-firms/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 7,137 workers at 66 large firms: Microsoft 365 Copilot cut about two hours of email a week but did not change how much work people did or what kind.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Randomised experiments on a retail platform: AI raised sales most where there had been no service</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-sales-experiments-online-retail/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-sales-experiments-online-retail/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Seven experiments on a large cross-border retail platform: AI raised sales by up to 16.3%, most where shoppers had got no help before. Returns and ratings did not worsen.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Shadow learning: how surgical trainees lost their way to learn</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/shadow-learning/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/shadow-learning/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A two-year study of robotic surgery: the new technology cut trainees out of the work, and only a minority reached competence, by bending the rules.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small firms that adopted AI hired faster: payroll records from Gusto</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/small-business-ai-adoption-and-hiring/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/small-business-ai-adoption-and-hiring/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Payroll records of 2,262 US small firms: a year after adopting AI, headcount was 6.8% higher than at similar firms, and about 10% higher for firms under 10 staff.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Small firms try AI less but use it as heavily: euro-area firm survey</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/euro-area-firms-ai-use-by-size/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/euro-area-firms-ai-use-by-size/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 5,067 euro-area firms: 41% of micro firms used no AI against 13% of large ones, yet about 7–8% made significant use of AI at every size.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Startups most exposed to AI cut staff, mostly juniors, and grew faster</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-and-startup-employment/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/genai-and-startup-employment/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of 94,789 US startups: those whose work was most exposed to AI cut staff by 8% within two quarters of ChatGPT, mostly juniors, while their output rose.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Students did better with ChatGPT in practice and worse without it on the exam</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-tutor-without-guardrails/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-tutor-without-guardrails/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Nearly 1,000 students in Turkey: open GPT-4 access raised practice grades 48%, but exam grades without AI were 17% below the no-AI group. A hints-only tutor avoided it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Census: 18% of firms use AI in a business function</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/us-census-ai-use-by-firms/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/us-census-ai-use-by-firms/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A US Census Bureau survey of all US firms: 18% used AI in late 2025, or 32% weighted by employment. Most used it to help staff, and 2% cut jobs because of it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Workers who trust AI more report thinking less critically about its output</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/critical-thinking-and-trust-in-ai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/critical-thinking-and-trust-in-ai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 319 knowledge workers: those more confident in AI reported less critical thinking about its output; those more confident in themselves reported more.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“66% of small businesses use AI”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/us-small-businesses-using-ai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/us-small-businesses-using-ai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The figure is in the source, a 2026 online survey for the US Chamber of Commerce, a business lobby that argues against state AI laws in the same report. The report does not say how firms were recruited or weighted. Other US counts of the same kind of firm, made in other ways, are far lower.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing (MIT)”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/mit-95-percent-of-ai-pilots-fail/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/mit-95-percent-of-ai-pilots-fail/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The figure is in the report, but the report is preliminary and not representative. It rests on 52 interviews, 153 survey answers collected at conferences and a review of public announcements. Its authors call the figures “directionally accurate” rather than based on company reporting, and it defines success in two different ways.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“Copilot saves UK civil servants 26 minutes a day”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/uk-copilot-26-minutes-a-day/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/uk-copilot-26-minutes-a-day/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The figure is in the UK government’s report, but it is what users estimated, not time measured. It comes from one survey question with answers in ranges. HMRC, with licences given at random, put the estimate at about an hour a week. The Department for Business and Trade found no evidence that time saved led to higher productivity.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Budget for people and process, not just tools</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/budget-for-people-and-process/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/budget-for-people-and-process/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Licences are the small part of the cost. Plan most of the time and money for training, redesigning work, and helping people through the change.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Measure readiness and resistance separately</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/measure-readiness-and-resistance-separately/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/measure-readiness-and-resistance-separately/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>Staff can be keen on AI and worried about it at once. Ask about the two separately. A single “readiness” score hides the worry.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Test AI knowledge instead of asking staff to rate their own</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/practices/test-ai-knowledge-not-self-ratings/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/practices/test-ai-knowledge-not-self-ratings/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Practice"/>
    <summary>People judge their own skills poorly. To find out what your staff know about AI, use a short knowledge test or a second opinion, not only a self-rating.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>accessiBe: an AI plug-in sold as making any website accessible, and a $1 million order</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/accessibe-ai-accessibility-claims/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/accessibe-ai-accessibility-claims/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>accessiBe sold website owners an AI plug-in and said it would make any site meet accessibility standards. The US consumer regulator said it did not, and that reviews praising it were paid for. The company paid $1 million.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Air Canada: held responsible for what its website chatbot told a customer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/air-canada-chatbot-ruling/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/air-canada-chatbot-ruling/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Air Canada’s website chatbot gave a customer wrong information about refunds. A Canadian tribunal ordered the airline to pay. It rejected the argument that the company was not responsible for its chatbot.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ashurst: first drafts 45–80% faster in timed trials, with lawyers still ahead on accuracy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ashurst-generative-ai-trials/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ashurst-generative-ai-trials/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>The law firm Ashurst tested generative AI with 411 of its people for five months and published the results. First drafts came 45% to 80% faster in timed tests. In a blind comparison, lawyers’ own drafts were more accurate on average, and one AI draft cited a wrong verdict.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Butler Snow: a firm with an AI policy, and a partner who did not follow it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/butler-snow-ai-policy-ignored/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/butler-snow-ai-policy-ignored/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>The firm’s policy required written approval before using ChatGPT for legal research. A partner used it without approval and filed five citations it had made up. The court removed three lawyers from the case. The firm paid for a check of 2,400 citations.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Delphia and Global Predictions: fined for saying they used AI that they did not have</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/delphia-global-predictions-ai-claims/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/delphia-global-predictions-ai-claims/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Two investment advisers advertised AI they did not have. One said its AI learned from client data. The other called itself the first regulated AI financial advisor. The US securities regulator fined them $225,000 and $175,000.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DoNotPay: a “robot lawyer” that was never tested against a lawyer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/donotpay-robot-lawyer/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/donotpay-robot-lawyer/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>DoNotPay told customers its AI could do the work of a lawyer. The US consumer regulator said the company had never tested whether that was true and employed no lawyers to check. It paid $193,000 and had to tell past subscribers about the limits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Duolingo: 148 new language courses in about a year, after 12 years for the first 100</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/duolingo-ai-course-content/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/duolingo-ai-course-content/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Duolingo replaced a slow, manual way of writing language courses with one built around AI. It launched 148 new courses in under a year, after taking about 12 years over its first 100. The same week, its chief executive told all staff what “AI-first” would mean for contractors, hiring and headcount.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>eBay: machine translation raised cross-border sales by about 11%</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ebay-machine-translation/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ebay-machine-translation/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>eBay began translating search queries and listing titles for Spanish-speaking buyers. A peer-reviewed study found that US exports to those buyers on eBay rose by 10.9%. It is one of the few AI results in retail measured by outside researchers.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EIST: a six-person metalworking shop cut quoting time from two hours to ten minutes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/eist-ai-quoting/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/eist-ai-quoting/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A metalworking shop with five employees and an owner used AI to price custom parts from 3D files and its own production history. A quote that could take two hours now takes about ten minutes. Most of the project was spent cleaning the firm’s data, and the owner still checks every quote.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gilberts: a smaller audit firm started with the AI in its existing tools and two firm rules</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/gilberts-chartered-accountants-ai-first-steps/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/gilberts-chartered-accountants-ai-first-steps/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A smaller UK audit and accountancy firm began with the AI features in tools it already had, on low-risk internal tasks. A partner reports that summarising a long document now takes 10 to 15 minutes where it took 45. The firm bars client data from public AI tools and treats every AI output as a first draft.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Herges: an AI model estimated production times five times more accurately than the firm’s experts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/herges-ai-production-time-estimates/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/herges-ai-production-time-estimates/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A family-owned steel fabricator prices one-off jobs from its experts’ estimates of how long the work will take. A public support centre helped it record real times and train an AI model on them. The model’s estimates were five times closer to the real figure than the experts’ own.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hitachi Energy: an AI model pointed to the two production steps that were spoiling chips</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/hitachi-energy-chip-yield/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/hitachi-energy-chip-yield/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Researchers trained an AI model on the production records of a chip plant and asked it which process steps did most to spoil chips. Engineers tested its two suggestions on a live batch, and losses fell by 21.7%. On a second product the same method cut losses by 51.3%. The plant’s usual analysis had missed both causes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Klarna: AI cut spending on outside marketing suppliers by a quarter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/klarna-ai-marketing/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/klarna-ai-marketing/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Klarna reported that AI tools let it spend 25% less on outside marketing suppliers while running more campaigns. For agencies, it is a client saying in public which work it has taken in-house.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Levidow, Levidow &amp; Oberman: fined after filing court papers with cases ChatGPT made up</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/mata-v-avianca-fake-citations/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/mata-v-avianca-fake-citations/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A lawyer used ChatGPT for legal research and filed six court decisions that did not exist. The court fined the firm and two of its lawyers. The judge said using AI was not the problem. Not checking was.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>META-Regalbau: sensors and AI analysis of order picking paid back in about a year</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/meta-regalbau-warehouse-analysis/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/meta-regalbau-warehouse-analysis/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A shelving manufacturer with about 300 employees had staff wear small sensors so that AI could analyse how orders are picked in its warehouse. The findings shaped the layout of a new warehouse and save about €22,000 a year. Managers, the works council and all staff were told the purpose from the start.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Milkforbubs: a small online shop put a ready-made chatbot on customer questions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/milkforbubs-whatsapp-chatbot/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/milkforbubs-whatsapp-chatbot/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A small online shop in Singapore bought a ready-made AI chatbot to answer customers. The team loaded it with common questions, trained staff, and keeps correcting its answers. The founder estimates the team spends 30% less time on customer questions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ministry of Clean: a cleaning company moved its customers from spreadsheets to a CRM with AI built in</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ministry-of-clean-ai-crm/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/ministry-of-clean-ai-crm/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A Singapore cleaning company kept its customer list in spreadsheets. It moved to ready-made customer-management software that drafts replies and suggests the next step with each lead. The company reports replies in 10 minutes where they took an hour, and 30% more sales revenue.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Morgan &amp; Morgan: eight made-up cases from the firm’s own AI tool, signed by three lawyers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/morgan-and-morgan-in-house-ai-fake-cases/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/morgan-and-morgan-in-house-ai-fake-cases/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A lawyer asked his firm’s own AI tool to add case law to a court filing. Eight of the nine cases it cited did not exist. Two other lawyers signed without reading. The firm had trained staff, and it then added a warning inside the tool.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NSW Reconstruction Authority: a temporary worker uploaded data on 2,031 people to ChatGPT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/nsw-reconstruction-authority-chatgpt-upload/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/nsw-reconstruction-authority-chatgpt-upload/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A temporary staff member uploaded a spreadsheet of flood-recovery applicants to ChatGPT, which the agency had not approved. It held personal and health details of 2,031 people. The agency then wrote AI guidance, tightened training and blocked such uploads.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Procter &amp; Gamble: one person with AI matched a two-person team without it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/procter-and-gamble-product-teams/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/procter-and-gamble-product-teams/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Researchers ran an experiment with 776 Procter &amp; Gamble staff on real product-development tasks. People working alone with AI produced ideas rated as highly as those of two-person teams without AI, and did it faster.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rite Aid: banned from facial recognition for five years after buying it without testing it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/rite-aid-facial-recognition/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/rite-aid-facial-recognition/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Rite Aid used facial recognition to spot suspected shoplifters. The US consumer regulator said the chain never asked its vendors how accurate the system was, never tested it and did not train staff. Shoppers were wrongly accused. The chain was banned from the technology for five years.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rue La La: machine-learning price recommendations raised revenue by about 10% in a test</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/rue-la-la-price-recommendations/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/rue-la-la-price-recommendations/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Rue La La, an online fashion retailer, had a tool built that predicts demand for products it has never sold and recommends a price for each. In a five-month test, researchers estimated that revenue on the tested products rose by 9.7%. The retailer set firm limits on what the tool could do before it let it near a price.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SAM: a two-person advisory firm cut the paperwork on each client file from six hours to two and a half</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/sam-retirement-advisory-ai-agents/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/sam-retirement-advisory-ai-agents/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A two-person firm that advises clients on retirement turned each client file into a fixed sequence of steps and gave the routine ones to AI. Administrative time per file fell from about six hours to two and a half. Set-up cost about €3,000 and 60 hours, and the adviser still approves important letters.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Siemens: inspectors caught more defects when the AI showed what it had seen</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/siemens-ai-visual-inspection/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/siemens-ai-visual-inspection/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Researchers gave 48 inspectors at a Siemens electronics factory an AI aid for checking circuit boards. Half saw only the AI’s score. Half also saw a picture marking where the AI had found a problem. The second group caught more defects, and most of them did better than the AI working alone.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Temple &amp; Webster: an online furniture retailer with about 200 staff put AI into customer care first</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/temple-and-webster-ai-customer-care/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/temple-and-webster-ai-customer-care/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Temple &amp; Webster sells furniture online with about 200 employees. It reports that AI and automation handle 80% of customer contacts in whole or in part, and that customer care now costs over 60% less as a share of revenue. It then set up central approval, training and a contact person for AI in every department.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Victoria’s child protection service: a worker put case details into ChatGPT, and the regulator ordered the tools blocked</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/victoria-child-protection-chatgpt/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/victoria-child-protection-chatgpt/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>A child protection worker typed personal details of a family into ChatGPT to draft a court report. The report contained errors. The privacy regulator found the department had no rules, no training and no technical limits for such tools, and ordered it to block them.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Walmart: generative AI used to fix 850 million pieces of product data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/walmart-product-catalogue/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/walmart-product-catalogue/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Walmart told investors it used generative AI to create or improve more than 850 million pieces of product data. The task is narrow, repetitive and easy to check, which is where AI tends to work.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Workado: an AI detector sold as 98% accurate that tested at 53%</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/workado-ai-detector-accuracy/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/workado-ai-detector-accuracy/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>Workado sold a tool that claims to tell AI-written text from human writing, and advertised it as 98% accurate. The US consumer regulator said independent testing put it at 53% on general text. Buyers had only the vendor’s word.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WPP: £300 million a year on an AI platform, and revenue still fell</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/wpp-open-ai-platform/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/cases/wpp-open-ai-platform/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Company case"/>
    <summary>WPP, one of the largest advertising groups, invested heavily in its own AI platform and reported wide use by staff. Its revenue still fell in 2025. Investing in AI did not, on its own, protect an agency’s income.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A measure of how exposed each occupation is to AI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-occupational-exposure/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-occupational-exposure/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>The AI Occupational Exposure measure links what AI can do to the abilities each occupation needs. It measures exposure, not job loss.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A review of 16 questionnaires that measure AI knowledge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-literacy-scales-review/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-literacy-scales-review/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A review of 16 AI-literacy questionnaires: 13 ask people to rate themselves, only 3 test what they can do, and none was checked across cultures.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI adoption, psychological safety and depression among employees</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-adoption-and-psychological-safety/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-adoption-and-psychological-safety/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 381 employees in South Korea, asked three times: AI adoption went with lower psychological safety and more depression. Ethical leadership softened that link.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI capability and company performance: a survey of 143 executives</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-capability-and-firm-performance/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-capability-and-firm-performance/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 143 senior executives: companies with stronger AI capability reported more creativity and better performance. One of the few tested AI scales.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI chatbots, earnings and hours: evidence from Denmark</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/chatbots-and-the-labour-market-denmark/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/chatbots-and-the-labour-market-denmark/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study linking Danish surveys to employment records: chatbots are widely used and reorganise tasks, but have not changed earnings or hours worked.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An AI assistant for 5,172 customer-support agents</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/generative-ai-at-work/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/generative-ai-at-work/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A field study of 5,172 support agents: an AI assistant raised issues resolved per hour by 15% on average, with the largest gains for less experienced staff.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ChatGPT and professional writing tasks: an experiment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/chatgpt-writing-experiment/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/chatgpt-writing-experiment/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 453 professionals: ChatGPT cut the time for writing tasks by 40% and raised quality by 18%. The gap between workers narrowed.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Digital skills at a financial company: employees versus supervisors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/digital-skills-employees-vs-supervisors/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/digital-skills-employees-vs-supervisors/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study at one financial company in Poland: employees and their supervisors described the employees’ digital skills differently.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Does readiness for change predict success? A review of 47 studies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/organizational-readiness-for-change-review/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/organizational-readiness-for-change-review/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A review of 47 healthcare studies, found by fixed search rules: readiness for change is measured in many different ways, and its link to results remains unclear.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Experts decided better when the AI showed where it had looked</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/explainable-ai-visual-inspection/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/explainable-ai-visual-inspection/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>Two experiments with 48 factory workers and 113 radiologists: experts shown what the AI’s score was based on were more accurate than experts shown the score alone.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Exposure is not adoption: what AI could do versus what it is used for</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/exposure-is-not-adoption/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/exposure-is-not-adoption/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A working paper argues that job-exposure scores show what AI could do, not what it is used for, and that actual use predicts hiring better.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fear of losing a job to AI and the hiding of knowledge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-job-insecurity-and-knowledge-hiding/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-job-insecurity-and-knowledge-hiding/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 402 employees in South Korea, asked three times: fear of losing work to AI went with lower psychological safety and more hiding of knowledge.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Generative AI and jobs: a global estimate from the ILO</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/generative-ai-and-jobs-ilo/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/generative-ai-and-jobs-ilo/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An International Labour Organization study of job exposure to generative AI: the main effect is likely to be support for workers, not replacement.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Knowing how AI works improves decisions about what to hand over</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-knowledge-and-delegation/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-knowledge-and-delegation/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 111 people: those taught how AI works delegated tasks to it more sensibly and performed better, but were less keen to use AI again.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leaders use AI daily while their organizations stay in pilots</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/individual-adoption-vs-organisational-maturity/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/individual-adoption-vs-organisational-maturity/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 179 leaders in Poland: 83% use AI daily, yet about 70% of their organizations have not moved beyond pilots. Barriers are mostly organizational.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OECD surveys of employers and workers on AI at work</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/oecd-ai-surveys-employers-workers/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/oecd-ai-surveys-employers-workers/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>OECD surveys in manufacturing and finance across seven countries: training staff and consulting them about AI go with better outcomes for workers.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ready for change, resistant, or both?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/change-readiness-and-resistance/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/change-readiness-and-resistance/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A review of research on change readiness and resistance to change argues they are not opposites: the same person can be both ready and resistant.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Self-rated digital skills versus test results in 629 students</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/self-rated-vs-tested-digital-skills/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/self-rated-vs-tested-digital-skills/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study of 629 students: what people say about their digital skills and what a test shows differ widely, with both overconfidence and underconfidence.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ten years of digital maturity models: do they predict results?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/decade-of-digital-maturity-models/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/decade-of-digital-maturity-models/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A review of eleven years of research on digital maturity models: critics point to the lack of data linking a maturity level to business performance.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The jagged frontier: AI helped consultants on some tasks and hurt on another</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/jagged-frontier/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/jagged-frontier/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>An experiment with 758 consultants: with AI they did more and faster on tasks AI handles well, and were less often correct on a task it handles badly.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The same AI pressure can raise or lower willingness to use AI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-technostress-and-adoption/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-technostress-and-adoption/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 301 employees in China, asked three times: AI demands seen as a challenge raised willingness to use AI. Demands seen as obstacles lowered it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>When a human plus AI beats either alone: 106 experiments</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/human-ai-combinations-meta-analysis/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/human-ai-combinations-meta-analysis/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study that combined 106 experiments: human-plus-AI teams did worse on average than the better of the two alone. Results depended on the type of task.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Which barriers hold back AI maturity? A survey of 108 specialists</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-barriers-and-ai-maturity/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/ai-barriers-and-ai-maturity/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A survey of 108 specialists in the Netherlands: a shortage of skilled employees held back AI maturity most. Infrastructure and data had no direct effect.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Which tasks can machines learn? 18,156 tasks scored</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/suitability-for-machine-learning/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/suitability-for-machine-learning/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A scoring of 18,156 work tasks: most jobs contain some tasks machine learning can do, few jobs can be fully automated, and gains need job redesign.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Whose view does a digital maturity score reflect?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/digital-readiness-model-for-smes/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/studies/digital-readiness-model-for-smes/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Study"/>
    <summary>A study proposing a readiness model for smaller firms notes that many maturity models reflect senior managers’ views, not measurable outcomes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“BCG’s AI Maturity Matrix shows how mature companies are”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/bcg-ai-maturity-matrix-rates-economies/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/bcg-ai-maturity-matrix-rates-economies/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>Two different BCG publications get mixed up. The AI Maturity Matrix rates national economies. The company figures come from a separate executive survey, and the tool behind it is not public.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“Microsoft has a maturity model for responsible AI”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/microsoft-responsible-ai-maturity-model/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/microsoft-responsible-ai-maturity-model/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The model exists as described: 24 dimensions, five levels, built from interviews with more than 90 specialists. One limit: it covers responsible AI only, not AI readiness in general.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“MIT Sloan shows that the barriers to digital transformation are mainly cultural”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/mit-sloan-path-to-digital-transformation/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/mit-sloan-path-to-digital-transformation/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The page cited is a collection of short articles with no single author or date. It says cultural, organizational and technical shifts are all needed. It does not say that culture is the main barrier.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>“Only 13% of companies are ready for AI”</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/cisco-ai-readiness-index-fully-ready/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/evidence/claim-checks/cisco-ai-readiness-index-fully-ready/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Claim check"/>
    <summary>The number is in the source. The population is not “companies”: Cisco surveyed leaders at organizations with 500 or more employees. Smaller firms are not in it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aias-4/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aias-4/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>Four questions that show how positive staff are about AI in general. Use it as a quick reading before a rollout, and again afterwards, inside one country.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI Capability scale</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ai-capability-scale/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ai-capability-scale/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 46-question survey of what a company has in place to use AI: data, technology, skills and the ability to change. Use it to see where leaders, IT and operations agree and where they do not.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI Competency Objective Scale (AICOS)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aicos/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aicos/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A test of AI knowledge and skill with right and wrong answers, including a part on generative AI. Use it when you want a test, not a self-rating, and need questions on tools like chat assistants.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI Occupational Exposure measure (AIOE)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aioe/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/aioe/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A public score of how far each occupation relies on abilities where AI has advanced. Matching scores exist for industries and regions. Use it to compare roles at a glance, then look at real tasks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI readiness pre-implementation checklist (SID and ADE)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ai-pre-implementation-checklist/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ai-pre-implementation-checklist/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A checklist of what should be in place before an AI system goes live, in eight areas including staff readiness and human factors. It was built from one hospital’s experience. Use it as a prompt list, not as a standard.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence scale (ATAI)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/atai/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/atai/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>Five questions that give two scores: how far a person accepts AI, and how far they fear it. Use it when you want hope and worry kept apart in a very short survey.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Composite measure of psychological safety (observation and survey)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/composite-psychological-safety-measure/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/composite-psychological-safety-measure/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>An observation sheet for a team meeting plus a short survey. It records what people do, such as speaking up or staying silent, not only what they say they do. Use it on the teams an AI rollout touches first.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/cfir/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/cfir/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A widely used list of everything that can help or block a new practice, with example interview questions for each item. Use it to plan interviews before an AI rollout, or to find out why one is stuck.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/dloq/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/dloq/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A staff survey of how well an organization learns, in seven areas. Use it to judge whether the company can absorb a new way of working.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dual-level model of AI readiness in the public sector</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/dual-level-ai-readiness-model/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/dual-level-ai-readiness-model/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A model for public bodies that looks at the readiness of the organization and of its people together. Use it as a structured list of what to check. Its weights come from expert opinion, not from data.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/gaais/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/gaais/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 20-question survey, with a 10-question short form, that scores positive and negative views of AI separately. It is the best-tested attitude scale here, but translating it needs the authors’ consent.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ILO index of occupational exposure to generative AI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ilo-generative-ai-exposure-index/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/ilo-generative-ai-exposure-index/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A public score of how far generative AI could do the tasks in each occupation, and whether it would more likely replace or assist the worker. Use it to choose where to look first. It is not a decision.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/mails/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/mails/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A self-rating questionnaire on AI skills that also asks how confident people feel about learning and solving problems with AI. Use it beside a knowledge test, not in place of one.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NASSS-CAT: complexity assessment tools for technology projects</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/nasss-cat/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/nasss-cat/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>Two checklists, a monitoring questionnaire and an interview guide for finding what makes a technology project hard. Use them to plan an AI rollout with the people it affects.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NoMAD: is a new way of working taking hold?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/nomad/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/nomad/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 23-question staff survey that shows whether a new practice is becoming part of normal work. Use it during and after an AI rollout, not before.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/oric/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/oric/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 12-question staff survey on one specific change: are people committed to it, and do they believe the organization can carry it out? Use it before a rollout, team by team.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Perception of Psychological Safety scale (PPS)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/perception-of-psychological-safety-scale/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/perception-of-psychological-safety-scale/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 14-question survey that separates three places where people feel safe or unsafe: the organization, their team, and one-to-one relations. Use it to find where the problem sits.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Psychological Safety Inventory (PSI)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/psychological-safety-inventory/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/psychological-safety-inventory/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A 30-question survey of how safe each employee feels at work, in five areas. Use it when you want a detailed picture and have room for a longer survey.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Scale of Artificial Intelligence Literacy for All (SAIL4ALL)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/sail4all/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/sail4all/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A knowledge test about AI for any adult, with right and wrong answers. It has four parts you can use separately. Use it to find out what staff know, not what they think they know.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>TPAH task analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/tpah/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/tpah/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>A method that scores each task in a company, not each job, on four separate scales: can AI do it, can this company deploy it, can AI help the person, and how much the task depends on a human.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trust in Automation Scale, short form (S-TIAS)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/s-tias/"/>
    <id>https://www.ai-first.company/assessments/s-tias/</id>
    <published>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Paweł Szczęsny</name><uri>https://www.ai-first.company/about/</uri></author>
    <category term="Assessment"/>
    <summary>Three questions on how far a person trusts a particular AI system. A 12-question long form exists. Use it for one named tool, and remember that more trust is not always better.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
