Company case

DoNotPay: a “robot lawyer” that was never tested against a lawyer

DoNotPay told customers its AI could do the work of a lawyer. The US consumer regulator said the company had never tested whether that was true and employed no lawyers to check. It paid $193,000 and had to tell past subscribers about the limits.

Outcome Went wrong

Something failed in work where AI was used, and there is a public record of it.

In the guide By industry

At a glance

Company
DoNotPayOnline subscription service for legal documents
Size
Not stated in the source
Industry
Professional services The service offered legal documents and advice, work that law firms do.
Where and when
United States. Subscribers 2021–2023, order final February 2025.
Who produced the figures
Official recordEverything on this page comes from two announcements by the US Federal Trade Commission. These are the regulator’s allegations, settled by agreement.

What happened

DoNotPay sold a subscription to an AI chatbot for legal problems. It called the service “the world’s first robot lawyer”. It told customers they could “sue for assault without a lawyer” and “generate perfectly valid legal documents in no time”.

What the regulator said

  • No test. The company never checked whether the chatbot’s output was as good as a human lawyer’s.
  • No lawyers. It had not hired or retained any lawyer to check the quality and accuracy of the legal features.
  • A feature that did not work. One feature claimed to check a small business’s website for legal problems using only an email address. The regulator said it was not effective.

The outcome

  • $193,000 paid.
  • Notice to subscribers. The company had to tell people who subscribed between 2021 and 2023 about the limits of its legal features.
  • No unproven claims. It may not say its service performs like a real lawyer unless it has the evidence.

The order was made final in February 2025.

What the case shows

  • “As good as a professional” is a claim that can be tested. Nobody at the company had tested it.
  • Legal output needs a qualified checker. The company sold legal documents with no lawyer in the process.
  • Buyers should ask for the test. A small business relying on this service for a legal document had only the advertising to go on.

What this says about the practices

Practices that were missing

Sources

  1. US Federal Trade Commission (25 September 2024). FTC announces crackdown on deceptive AI claims and schemes. Press release. ftc.gov
  2. US Federal Trade Commission (11 February 2025). FTC finalizes order with DoNotPay that prohibits deceptive “AI lawyer” claims, imposes monetary relief, and requires notice to past subscribers. Press release. ftc.gov