Study

AI adoption, psychological safety and depression among employees

Where employees reported more AI adoption at their company, they later reported lower psychological safety, and then more symptoms of depression. Ethical leadership weakened the first link.

At a glance

Source
Kim, Kim and Lee (2025). The dark side of artificial intelligence adoption: linking artificial intelligence adoption to employee depression via psychological safety and ethical leadership. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05040-2
How it was done
An online survey in three rounds, spaced apart in time. The researchers used a statistical model to test how the answers were linked. Repeated survey. The same people answered questions at several points in time.
Who took part
381 employees of companies.
Where
South Korea.

“AI adoption has a significant negative impact on psychological safety, which in turn increases levels of depression.”

What it found

Psychological safety means people feel able to speak up, ask questions and admit mistakes without being punished for it.

  • More AI adoption at the company went with lower psychological safety among employees.
  • Lower psychological safety went with more symptoms of depression.
  • Where employees rated their leaders as ethical, meaning fair, honest and open about decisions, AI adoption did less damage to psychological safety.

When the result holds

The study measured how employees see their company’s AI adoption and how they feel. It followed the same people over three rounds, which gives a better sense of order than a single survey.

Limits

  • All measures are employees’ own answers.
  • The same research team ran this study and a closely related one. Independent teams have not yet repeated it.

Practices that use this study

This study supports:

Assessments linked to this study