Study

Ten years of digital maturity models: do they predict results?

It is widely assumed that a higher digital maturity level means better performance. The review found that researchers question this: the models lack objective scoring criteria, and data linking maturity to performance is missing.

At a glance

Source
Thordsen and Bick (2023). A decade of digital maturity models: much ado about nothing?. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 21(4), 947–976. doi:10.1007/s10257-023-00656-w
How it was done
The authors reviewed eleven years of research on digital maturity models and set out the main points of dispute among researchers. Systematic review. It searches for all published studies on a question, by fixed rules, and sums up what they show.
Who took part
Published research on digital maturity models.
Where
International.

“Various critical voices question the actual practical and theoretical value of DMMs, underlining the absence of objective evaluation criteria of these models and pointing out the lack of empirical data to prove the suggested relationship between maturity and performance.”

What it found

A maturity model places an organization on a ladder of levels, usually from beginner to advanced, and suggests what to do to climb.

  • Many such models exist, and their value is disputed among researchers.
  • Critics point to two gaps. The models have no objective criteria for judging a level. And there is little data showing that a higher level goes with better business results.

(“DMMs” in the quote stands for digital maturity models.)

When the result holds

The review is about digital maturity models in general. AI maturity models are built the same way, so the same doubts apply. That step is our inference and not a finding of the review.

Limits

  • It reports a dispute. It does not itself test whether maturity predicts results.

Practices that use this study

This study supports:

Assessments linked to this study

Claim checks that cite this study