Company case

EIST: a six-person metalworking shop cut quoting time from two hours to ten minutes

A metalworking shop with five employees and an owner used AI to price custom parts from 3D files and its own production history. A quote that could take two hours now takes about ten minutes. Most of the project was spent cleaning the firm’s data, and the owner still checks every quote.

Outcome Company-reported result

The company published the figures itself.

At a glance

Company
EISTMaker of custom sheet-metal parts and industrial equipment
Size
Micro and small (1–49 employees) The official case page gives the size as five employees and one owner-manager.
Industry
Manufacturing
Where and when
France. A project of six to eight months, published June 2026.
Who produced the figures
The company itselfThe figures are the owner’s own estimates, published by France Num, the French government’s programme for the digital transformation of small firms.

What they did

EIST is a very small firm in Lyon. It makes custom sheet-metal parts and industrial equipment. Every job is different, so every request needs its own quote. Some took several hours to price. The owner, who took the firm over three years earlier, says: “We sometimes missed opportunities because I did not have the time to reply.”

He saw a video of AI estimating the cost of a part from its 3D file, and decided to try it. The project ran for six to eight months. The aim was for the AI to use the firm’s own history to predict, for a new part:

  • the manufacturing steps,
  • the production time,
  • the material cost,
  • the margin,
  • the final price.

Before any of that could work, the data had to be put in order:

  • cleaning the records in the firm’s business software;
  • structuring the parts lists;
  • linking each 3D file to the record of how the part was actually made;
  • tidying up the standard manufacturing routes.

The owner ran the project himself with his assistant and did not hire a consulting firm. The region and a local business-support body gave advice and funding.

The numbers

  • About 10 minutes for a quote, where it sometimes took two hours.
  • About 90% of quotes are reliable, by the firm’s estimate.

What was hard

The owner says the main difficulty was the data, and the technology came second. “If the data is not clean, the tool will not be reliable.” The firm also had to learn, step by step, how far to trust the results.

What the case shows

  • Six people can do this. The owner ran the project himself with his assistant, without a consulting firm.
  • The firm’s own records were the raw material. The AI learned from past jobs, so the past jobs had to be recorded properly first.
  • One task, chosen because it cost orders. Slow quotes meant lost customers.
  • The owner still signs off. The AI prepares the quote, and he checks and adjusts it.

What this says about the practices

Practices the company applied

Sources

  1. France Num (9 June 2026). Comment une TPE industrielle utilise l’IA pour réaliser un devis en 10 minutes au lieu de 2 heures. Case page, in French. francenum.gouv.fr